Curse

Saraphim · May 04, 2008, 11:55 PM // 23:55

/not signed.

I'd get kicked from my own guild under those rules.. which would leave my hubby bouncing around on his own in the (utterly pointless) Guild Hall we have.

Yes we do particpate in the odd skirmish against each other just for laughs.

legion_rat · May 05, 2008, 01:50 AM // 01:50

You realize that everyone in my guild/alliance would be booted, including the leaders? What an great idea!

/fail

As already mentioned there are guilds/alliances that DO pvp at all. I joined one for that soul reason. PvP is not for everyone. Would you also add the option that every player has to do missions in PvE to balance this? What about PvP only accounts?

/notsigned

~the rat~

yum · May 05, 2008, 04:17 AM // 04:17

/signed if the req is optional on specific members.

MasterSasori · May 05, 2008, 05:11 AM // 05:11

Do you know how many people in my guild will HATE you for this suggestion?

/epic fail

Darkobra · May 05, 2008, 05:17 AM // 05:17

You didn't think this through very well, did you? Not everyone likes PVP.

Targuil · May 05, 2008, 05:19 AM // 05:19

/Not signed.

Bront · May 05, 2008, 07:22 AM // 07:22

No more guilds of less than 8...

Bad, bad idea.

**Marty Silverblade** · May 05, 2008, 07:28 AM // 07:28

My guild hasn't GvGed in 2 and a half years. It's called a PvE guild. Besides, what about the new players? I don't think a lvl 5 wants to play full scale PvP.

Sparks Dawnbringer · May 05, 2008, 09:11 AM // 09:11

/not signed There are 2 people in my guild we started it to get people to stop asking us to join their guild. We HATE PvP and never want to do it ever. Now wouldn't it be a bit foolish for me and my guild mate to be fighting another guild with a full roster!!!

quickmonty · May 05, 2008, 10:02 PM // 22:02

Do some research and find out how many guilds are PvE ONLY before posting ideas like this.

/NOTsigned

Dallcingi · May 05, 2008, 10:06 PM // 22:06

There is no point of doing a gvg if the member has no clue what they are doing...
/not signed.

crazybanshee · May 05, 2008, 10:46 PM // 22:46

Uh, /notsigned. I've been in a guild over a year, am an officer, and have never been in a gvg. My guild doesn't gvg. That's like saying all PVP chars should be forced to PVE through a campaign or lose access to HA. No sense at all.

Gli · May 06, 2008, 12:25 AM // 00:25

I want to amend this proposal. Every female elementalist should spent one hour each month dancing naked in the infamous cage at the LA merchants, or suffer a 72 hour ban.

You can't see me · May 06, 2008, 02:30 AM // 02:30

...why would we change the system to cater to the .001% of guilds who this would be useful to?

/Not Signed.

Lycan Nibbler · May 06, 2008, 03:51 AM // 03:51

When my guild consisting of me can GvG, I will sign this.... until then

/not signed

Operative 14 · May 06, 2008, 03:58 AM // 03:58

What prompted this suggestion might I ask?

If guilds want to uphold an absurd requirement like this, then they should do it on their own. There is absolutely no reason why this should be an innate game mechanic.

pumpkin pie · May 06, 2008, 03:59 AM // 03:59

how about if the guild that promises you that they PvP alot, and when you join, and you wait, and wait and all the time you see in the guild chat need R8+ only R5+ only. can I then be automatically assign as the guild leader?

HuntMaster Avatar · May 06, 2008, 04:03 AM // 04:03

/notsigned.

Picture this. You gvg, you fail, you get blamed, you get booted. Bad idea. Good way to kill guilds.

TheGuildWarsPenguin · May 06, 2008, 04:07 AM // 04:07

joke topic.

/signed

trialist · May 06, 2008, 04:24 AM // 04:24

New guild is formed. Guild leader goes recruiting, gets 6 members and trains them. Was looking for last member to GvG when timeframe is up. All his members get kicked.

LOL?